Office Fit Out Cost Guide Asia Pacific 2026

A Cushman & Wakefield Publication

OFFICE Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

ASIA PACIFIC

Introduction The Asia Pacific economy faced an array of new challenges in 2025. At the forefront was the introduction of tariffs on exports to the U.S., set at levels not seen in nearly a century. Inflation and interest rates remained central themes across the region, with the region bifurcating between a majority of markets facing sub-par inflation and continuing to cut rates, while a smaller minority contended with stronger inflationary pressures and the prospect of further rate hikes. In reflection of this, at the regional level, fit out costs increased only modestly year- over-year (YOY), in both U.S. dollar and local currency terms. However, there was a strong divergence between markets below this regional average. As we head further into 2026, uncertainty continues to prevail. The tariff landscape has shifted once again and conflict in the Middle East has escalated. Prior to the events of late February and early March, regional growth was forecast at 3.7% in 2026, from an estimated 4.3% in 2025. Should the region follow this script, it is consistent with the Asia Pacific region absorbing approximately 77 million square feet (msf) of space through 2026.

Cost pressures are continuing to ease insofar as the consensus view is for labour and material costs to only marginally increase over the next six months. For the most part, project backlogs and lead times both appear well under control. Together these factors should give companies greater assuredness in underlying project costs and timelines, suggesting now is an opportune time to undertake key capital expenditure projects. In this guide, we have maintained our coverage of 33 key cities across Asia Pacific and continue to provide greater insights into the construction industry through our Asia Pacific Contractor Sentiment Survey. A comprehensive fit out cost section covering furniture, mechanical & electrical works, builder works, audio visual/IT and other miscellaneous costs is also included. Consequently, this guide serves as a key resource to assist companies in defining their capital planning and relocation budgets.

The pricing benchmarks included in this guide reflect market conditions as of December 2025 and represent average fit out costs across the covered markets. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, ongoing geopolitical developments, including conflict in the Middle East, may influence supply chains, material availability, labour markets and energy costs, which could impact future pricing. As such, these figures should be considered indicative benchmarks rather than fixed project costs, and we recommend seeking project-specific advice for current market pricing.

IOI PROPERTIES, SINGAPORE

2

3

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

Market Review and Outlook Economy

Of course, not all economies are being equally impacted. At the headline level, those economies that have strong domestic consumption or have limited trade exposure to the U.S. are forecast to lead the region. In contrast, those with weaker consumption and more trade exposure are expected to experience comparatively slower growth. Despite macroeconomic uncertainty, businesses became considerably more optimistic as they successfully navigated changing market conditions and have now started to reinvest in their growth strategies. No doubt, the exceptional growth of the AI sector has been a key component of this renewed confidence. Furthermore, selective interest rate cuts will bring down the cost of debt and provide additional support for growth.

The regional economy has shown considerable resilience through what had been a volatile year. Growth in H1 2025 largely exceeded expectations, although the underlying drivers have been “choppy.” The imposition of U.S. tariffs has had global ramifications, felt more acutely in Asia Pacific given the breadth and depth of trade ties. Accordingly, the changing tariff environment has resulted in surges and pull- backs in demand as exporters have rushed to fill orders before tariff hikes have taken effect. Such activity has supported economic growth through 2025, with revised regional GDP estimated at 4.3%. Amidst this, inflation remains in the spotlight but for differing reasons. On the one hand, price growth remains anaemic on the Chinese mainland and in Thailand; on the other, a recent surge in Australia has ignited concerns of re-inflationary pressures. Between these extremes, inflation remains weaker than many central banks would like, reflecting subdued domestic consumption. As a result, most central banks continue to maintain an accommodative bias while the Bank of Japan— and now the Reserve Bank of Australia—have hiked rates. In late February, the tariff landscape shifted once again and escalation of conflict in the Middle East has further clouded the growth outlook. Prior to these events, growth had been expected to slow through H1 2026 before improving in the second half of the year, resulting in average annual growth of 3.7%. Although not part of the baseline scenario, any early reduction in tariffs is an upside risk for the region that could help drive stronger growth.

WPP, SINGAPORE

Figure 1: Real GDP growth (% average annual) for select markets in 2025 and 2026

2025

2026

0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0%

Source: Moody’s Analytics; Cushman & Wakefield

SIMCORP, PHILIPPINES

4

5

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

CECO, SINGAPORE

Office Market Total prime net absorption across Asia Pacific’s top 27 markets reached 92 msf in 2025, up from the 76 msf recorded in 2024 as markets continue to recover from 2022 lows. While occupiers have adopted a cautious approach to the market, the expansive nature of the region has continued to underpin ongoing space demand.

India has led this growth story; what started as a post-pandemic rebound has evolved into an enduring trend of significant demand with India’s top eight cities accounting for two-thirds of regional demand. Such demand trends are forecast to continue through 2026, albeit with a slight normalisation in Indian office demand following outperformance in 2025. A notable change from recent trends has emerged on the supply side. Total new supply under construction across the region’s core markets started 2026 at 386 msf, with 192 msf located in India’s top eight cities and 194 msf across the remaining 19 cities. The latter figure is well below the nearly 410 msf peak recorded in early 2018, underscoring the impact of elevated construction costs on the office market. Accordingly, vacancy is expected to trend down over the forecast horizon and support accelerating rental growth. Such trends are likely to be exacerbated for high-quality buildings in high-quality locations. Corporates are therefore well advised to prioritise decision making on high-priority sites to secure in-demand space.

Figure 2: Regional annual grade A office net absorption (msf) and vacancy rate by broad geography*

120

20%

Tier 1 Chinese mainland

India

Rest of APAC Vacancy rate (rhs)

18%

100

16%

14%

80

12%

60

10%

8%

40

6%

4%

20

2%

0

0%

* Tier 1 Chinese mainland = Beijing, Guangzhou, Shanghai, Shenzhen India = Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Delhi NCR, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai, Pune Rest of APAC = Adelaide, Bangkok, Brisbane, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Hong Kong, Jakarta, Kuala Lumpur, Manila, Melbourne, Perth, Seoul, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo.

Source: Cushman & Wakefield

6

7

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

Backlogs are mostly under control

Views on labour and raw material cost increases divided opinions • Labour costs were seen as the primary driver of price increases in Australia, Indonesia and— to a lesser extent—Vietnam. In these locations, Project execution times also expected to increase modestly • Only Vietnam and the Chinese mainland have noticeably lower execution and lead times than the regional average.

The worst of pricing pressure is now over

70%

90%

• Price increases remain muted in Greater China, and more pronounced in Australia and India. • Nearly 70% expect only a slight increase in pricing over the next six months • A further 20% expect prices to remain flat

• Almost 90% of respondents reported backlogs of six months or less. • In Indonesia, one-third of respondents reported seven to eight month backlogs. • In Japan, nearly 25% reported backlogs in excess of ten months, mainly attributed to the shrinking construction workforce and limitations on overtime.

while the tight labour market has eased somewhat, pressures remain in 2026.

• In contrast, weaker labour dynamics on the Chinese mainland and lower wage pressure in South Korea and Japan saw respondents attribute cost increases more to raw materials.

Contractor Sentiment

At a regional level, contractors are positive on the sector’s outlook, with an overwhelming 70% expecting conditions to improve slightly or significantly. Australia and India are standouts here at over 90%, with most of Southeast Asia above the regional average. Together these factors should give companies greater assuredness in underlying project costs and timelines, suggesting now is an opportune time to undertake key capital expenditure projects before activity begins to accelerate.

Project lead times likely to remain benign

Respondents were roughly evenly split on the impacts of tariffs

Results from Cushman & Wakefield’s Asia Pacific Contractor Sentiment Survey, which obtained the views of over 180 general contractors from around the region in December 2025 and January 2026, confirm that the sector is healthy and the outlook is positive for the year ahead.

51%

33%

• Approximately one-third expect an increase in project lead times; the remainder are neutral or expect a slight decrease. • Japan is an outlier: 85% of respondents there expect a slight increase. • India, Indonesia and Malaysia also sit slightly higher than average.

• Regionally, 41% expected no impact on vendor pricing, while 51% expected a slight increase • Respondents in India expect a higher risk of significantly increased pricing; overall there was little intraregional variation • The cause of these potential increases remains unclear, as most Asia Pacific economies have not enacted reciprocal tariffs on imported goods, but could reflect contingency planning in response to heightened geopolitical volatility and broader disruptions to global shipping and supply chains.

8

9

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

ZEISS, VIETNAM

Average Fit Out Costs In 33 Cities Across Asia Pacific

AVERAGE COST (USD PER SQ FT)

RANK REGION

CITY

1

TOKYO

215

NORTH ASIA

2

OSAKA

210

3

NAGOYA

206

4

CANBERRA

182

5

AUCKLAND

174

AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND

210

OSAKA

6

BRISBANE

162

SEOUL

130

95

BEIJING

7

SYDNEY

161

BUSAN

TOKYO

120

GREATER CHINA

8

HONG KONG

160

215

SHANGHAI

96

9

MELBOURNE

157

DELHI

206

NAGOYA

AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND

10

ADELAIDE

149

SHENZHEN

69

GUANGZHOU

85

KOLKATA

10=

PERTH

149

87

TAIPEI

145

65

AHMEDABAD

65

GREATER CHINA

12

TAIPEI

145

HANOI

63

HONG KONG

73

MUMBAI

SOUTHEAST ASIA

13

SINGAPORE

140

HYDERABAD

65

PUNE

MANILA

65

105

14

SEOUL

130

BANGKOK

91

NORTH ASIA

65

61

CHENNAI

HO CHI MINH CITY

15

BUSAN

120

BENGALURU

67

KUALA LUMPUR

80

SOUTHEAST ASIA

16

MANILA

105

SINGAPORE

140

17

SHANGHAI

96

GREATER CHINA

18

BEIJING

95

58

SOUTHEAST ASIA

19

BANGKOK

91

JAKARTA

20

SHENZHEN

87

GREATER CHINA

21

GUANGZHOU

85

SOUTHEAST ASIA

22

KUALA LUMPUR

80

23

MUMBAI

73

24

DELHI

69

162

BRISBANE

25

BENGALURU

67

149

PERTH

161

SYDNEY

AUCKLAND

26=

AHMEDABAD

65

149

ADELAIDE

INDIA

26=

CHENNAI

65

182

174

CANBERRA

26=

HYDERABAD

65

157

MELBOURNE

26=

KOLKATA

65

26=

PUNE

65

31

HANOI

63

SOUTHEAST ASIA

32

HO CHI MINH CITY

61

33

JAKARTA

58

10

11

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

How do we classify fit outs? LOW (BASIC)

MEDIUM (COLLABORATIVE)

Data points to equal desk positions

Limited meeting facilities, less than 10% of space

Low specification finishes and carpet throughout

Medium specification carpet & hard

Meeting facilities around 10 - 20% of space, with part single glazed partitions

Shared heating & cooling across cellularised space

flooring to reception

Vinyl flooring to cafeterias

Minimal sustainability certifications

Good sustainability certifications

Multiple data points to each desk position

• Limited meeting facilities, less than 10% of space

• Data points to equal desk positions

• Meeting facilities around 10–20% of space, with part single-glazed partitions

• Shared heating & cooling across cellularised space

• Support functions limited to basic pantry area, generic meeting rooms and limited drop-in collaborative spaces • Minimal sustainability certifications, energy efficiency remains the main priority

• Paint to all walls

• Hard flooring to reception

• Alterations to less than 25% of ceiling

• Low specification finishes and carpet throughout

• Multiple data points to each desk position • Support functions include an expanded break-out area, a variety of meeting rooms and dispersed collaborative spaces • Good sustainability certifications, designs focus on energy, greenhouse gas, water, waste optimization

• Plasterboard ceiling to meeting rooms

• Vinyl flooring to cafeterias

• Feature wall finishes in reception

• Minimal alterations to air conditioning and ventilation

• Medium specification carpet and finishes • Low/medium quality acoustic attenuation & management

12

13

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

How do we classify fit outs?

HIGH (ADVANCED)

Feature finishes to meeting rooms/offices

Meeting facilities to over 25% of space with double-glazed partitions

Dedicated heating & cooling across cellularised space

High specification carpet

Broad spectrum sustainability certifications

• Meeting facilities to over 25% of space with double-glazed partitions

• Support functions include multi-functional breakout area, a variety of meeting rooms, dispersed collaborative spaces augmented with specialist lifestyle elements such as a library, focus and relaxation zones • Client facing areas with hospitality look and feel • Broad spectrum of sustainability activities and top level certifications; health and wellness, employee productivity, reductions in embodied carbon add to standards expected in basic or medium standards

• Alterations to over 25% of ceiling

• Features & plasterboard ceiling to reception and offices

• Feature finishes to meeting rooms/offices

• High specification carpet

• Dedicated heating & cooling across cellularised space • Medium/high quality acoustic attenuation & management • Heavily tech-enabled spaces with frictionless audio-visual connectivity

WPP, SINGAPORE

14

15

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

ASTRAZENECA, VIETNAM

Integrating ESG into Office Fit Outs

Cushman & Wakefield’s Sustainability & ESG team supports occupiers at every stage of this journey — helping translate ESG ambition into practical, cost-effective workplace outcomes.

The most effective workplaces are no longer defined by design alone, but by how they perform over time. Increasingly, occupiers are factoring ESG into how they select buildings, design workplaces, and manage long-term costs. What was once a compliance or reputational issue is now directly influencing occupier sustainability goals—such as net zero—and driving capital expenditure decisions. This impacts how occupiers locate, invest and operate space.

Matt Clifford Head of Sustainability & ESG, APAC matthew.clifford@cushwake.com

STEP 01

STEP 02

STEP 03

STEP 04

PRE DESIGN

DESIGN & DELIVERY

OPERATIONS

SITE SELECTION

Early decisions set the foundation for performance and cost efficiency.

Balancing cost and performance is critical during delivery.

Sustainable outcomes depend on how the space is used and managed.

Choosing the right building can significantly influence sustainability outcomes before a fit out even begins. • Prioritise high-performing buildings and collaborative landlords

• Define enterprise and site-specific ESG goals

• Evaluate long-term operational impacts vs upfront savings

• Ensure operational practices support design intent

• Identify priorities (e.g. energy, carbon, wellbeing)

• Leverage smart design, materials, and technology for efficiency

• Monitor and communicate whole-of- life costs

• Assess climate risk and long-term asset resilience

• Determine where to invest vs. where to optimise costs

• Avoid removing features that deliver lifecycle value

• Align workplace performance with 2030 ESG targets

• Consider access to renewable energy and associated costs

• Establish clear workplace and sustainability standards to guide design

• Focus investment on high-impact sustainability outcomes

• Continuously optimise energy, waste, and user experience

• Align site selection with your organisation’s ESG targets

16

17

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

Asia Pacific Fit Out Costs by Market

USING THE GUIDE

Estimated costs provided herein are indicative of market averages based on certain assumptions. Exact costs for specific projects may differ to those presented here, and so we recommend engaging a Project & Development Services professional to advise on precise costings based on your unique construction requirements.

L-ACOUSTICS, SINGAPORE

18

19

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

Cushman & Wakefield, Sydney, Australia

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD PERTH OFFICE, AUSTRALIA

Australia & New Zealand

“ALL-IN” FIT OUT COSTS

RETROFIT COST (USD PER SQ FT)

FIT OUT COST (USD PER SQ FT)

COLLABORATIVE HYBRID

CITY

BASIC HYBRID

ADVANCED HYBRID AVERAGE

ADELAIDE BRISBANE CANBERRA MELBOURNE

102

149

246

90

108

162

270

98

101

182

301

96

104

157

262

95

PERTH

86

149

248

90

SYDNEY

107

161

268

97

AUCKLAND

88

174

272

105

REINSTATEMENT COST(USD PER SQUARE FOOT)

CITY

LOW

AVERAGE

HIGH

ADELAIDE BRISBANE CANBERRA MELBOURNE

11

24

32

12

27

34

13

25

33

14

26

35

PERTH

11

24

32

AUSTRALIA Hutch Bykerk hutch.bykerk@cushwake.com

NEW ZEALAND Todd Hanrahan todd.hanrahan@cushwake.com

SYDNEY

16

26

35

AUCKLAND

18

29

39

20

21

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

Cushman & Wakefield, Sydney, Australia

Greater China

“ALL-IN” FIT OUT COSTS

RETROFIT COST (USD PER SQ FT)

FIT OUT COST (USD PER SQ FT)

COLLABORATIVE HYBRID

CITY

BASIC HYBRID

ADVANCED HYBRID AVERAGE

BEIJING

65

95

150

38

GUANGZHOU

50

85

115

34

HONG KONG

103

160

256

64

SHANGHAI

70

96

164

42

SHENZHEN

52

87

120

35

TAIPEI

57

145

220

110

REINSTATEMENT COST (USD PER SQUARE FOOT)

CITY

LOW

AVERAGE

HIGH

BEIJING

6

10

15

GREATER CHINA - NORTH CHINA Meng Zhao meng.zhao@cushwake.com

GREATER CHINA - EAST CHINA Johnson Kong johnson.fb.kong@cushwake.com

GREATER CHINA - SOUTH CHINA Michael Wu michael.wu1@cushwake.com

GUANGZHOU HONG KONG

6

9

12

25

38

59

SHANGHAI SHENZHEN

7

10

15

GREATER CHINA - HONG KONG Ranee Ng ranee.ng@cushwake.com

GREATER CHINA - TAIWAN Gile Wei gile.wei@cushwake.com

6

9

12

TAIPEI

23

27

30

22

23

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

Cushman & Wakefield, Sydney, Australia

APTIA, INDIA

India

RETROFIT COST (USD PER SQ FT)

FIT OUT COST (USD PER SQ FT)

COLLABORATIVE HYBRID

CITY

BASIC HYBRID

ADVANCED HYBRID AVERAGE

“ALL-IN” FIT OUT COSTS

AHMEDABAD BENGALURU

35

65

129

57

37

67

131

58

CHENNAI

35

65

125

55

DELHI

37

69

135

59

HYDERABAD

35

65

129

57

KOLKATA

35

65

125

55

MUMBAI

42

73

144

66

PUNE

35

65

129

57

REINSTATEMENT COST (USD PER SQUARE FOOT)

CITY

LOW

AVERAGE

HIGH

AHMEDABAD BENGALURU

5

9

13

6

9

13

CHENNAI

5

8

12

DELHI

6

9

13

HYDERABAD

6

9

13

KOLKATA

6

8

12

INDIA Shashi Bushan shashi.bushan@cushwake.com

MUMBAI

7

10

15

PUNE

5

9

13

24

25

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

MORRISON FOERSTER, JAPAN

North Asia

RETROFIT COST (USD PER SQ FT)

“ALL-IN” FIT OUT COSTS

FIT OUT COST (USD PER SQ FT)

COLLABORATIVE HYBRID

CITY

BASIC HYBRID

ADVANCED HYBRID AVERAGE

NAGOYA

124

206

354

87

OSAKA

127

210

361

88

TOKYO

129

215

370

90

BUSAN

95

120

230

77

SEOUL

95

130

240

86

REINSTATEMENT COST (USD PER SQUARE FOOT)

CITY

LOW

AVERAGE

HIGH

NAGOYA

37

52

84

OSAKA

37

53

85

TOKYO

39

54

87

SOUTH KOREA Jaehong Lee jaehong.lee@cushwake.com

BUSAN

14

19

33

JAPAN Jun Matthews jun.matthews@cushwake.com

SEOUL

16

23

36

26

27

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

MICROSOFT, THAILAND

Southeast Asia

RETROFIT COST (USD PER SQ FT)

FIT OUT COST (USD PER SQ FT)

“ALL-IN” FIT OUT COSTS

COLLABORATIVE HYBRID

CITY

BASIC HYBRID

ADVANCED HYBRID AVERAGE

JAKARTA

40

58

85

32

KUALA LUMPUR

60

80

120

53

MANILA

60

105

150

68

SINGAPORE

102

140

212

63

BANGKOK

57

91

160

71

HANOI

41

63

110

33

HO CHI MINH CITY

40

61

105

32

REINSTATEMENT COST (USD PER SQUARE FOOT)

CITY

LOW

AVERAGE

HIGH

JAKARTA

9

10

12

KUALA LUMPUR

6

10

14

MANILA

15

20

25

SINGAPORE

16

19

25

BANGKOK

9

12

16

HANOI

4

5

7

SINGAPORE Grant Carter grant.carter@cushwake.com

SOUTHEAST ASIA Riaz Khan riaz.khan1@cushwake.com

HO CHI MINH CITY

4

5

7

28

29

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

APTIA PROJECT, INDIA

Average Costs At A Glance In USD/SQFT

Average Costs At A Glance In Local Metrics

REGION

CITY

FIT OUT RETROFIT REINSTATEMENT

REGION

CITY

METRIC FIT OUT

RETROFIT REINSTATEMENT

ADELAIDE

149

90

24

ADELAIDE

2,406

1,453

387

BRISBANE

162

98

27

BRISBANE

2,615

1,582

436

CANBERRA

182

96

25

CANBERRA

2,938

1,550

404

AUD/sqm

AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND

MELBOURNE

157

95

26

MELBOURNE

2,535

1,534

420

AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND

PERTH

149

90

24

PERTH

2,406

1,453

387

SYDNEY

161

97

26

SYDNEY

2,599

1,566

420

AUCKLAND

174

105

29

AUCKLAND

NZD/sqm

3,261

1,968

543

BEIJING

95

38

10

BEIJING

7,161

2,865

754

RMB/sqm

GUANGZHOU

85

34

9

GUANGZHOU

6,407

2,563

678

HONG KONG

160

64

38

HONG KONG

HKD/sqft

1,245

498

296

GREATER CHINA

GREATER CHINA

SHANGHAI

96

42

10

SHANGHAI

7,237

3,166

754

RMB/sqm

SHENZHEN

87

35

9

SHENZHEN

6,558

2,638

678

TAIPEI

145

110

27

TAIPEI

TWD/ping

161,621

122,609

30,095

AHMEDABAD

65

57

9

AHMEDABAD

5,847

5,125

789

BENGALURU

67

58

9

BENGALURU

6,027

5,228

789

CHENNAI

65

55

8

CHENNAI

5,847

4,945

756

DELHI

69

59

9

DELHI

6,207

5,305

807

INDIA

INDIA

INR/sqft

HYDERABAD

65

57

9

HYDERABAD

5,847

5,125

785

KOLKATA

65

55

8

KOLKATA

5,847

4,945

757

MUMBAI

73

66

10

MUMBAI

6,567

5,934

896

PUNE

65

57

9

PUNE

5,847

5,125

789

NAGOYA

206

87

52

NAGOYA

1,148,547

485,066

289,925

OSAKA

210

88

53

OSAKA

JPY/tsubo

1,170,849

490,642

295,500

NORTH ASIA

TOKYO

215

90

54

NORTH ASIA

TOKYO

1,198,726

501,792

301,075

BUSAN

120

77

19

BUSAN

1,862,875

1,195,345

294,955

KRW/sqm

SEOUL

130

86

23

SEOUL

2,018,115

1,335,061

357,051

JAKARTA

58

32

10

JAKARTA

IDR/sqm 10,425,601

5,665,775

1,797,517

KUALA LUMPUR

80

53

10

KUALA LUMPUR MYR/sqft

325

215

41

MANILA

PHP/sqm 66,562

43,107

12,678

MANILA

105

68

20

SOUTHEAST ASIA

SINGAPORE

SGD/sqft

180

81

24

SINGAPORE

140

63

19

SOUTHEAST ASIA

BANGKOK

THB/sqm 30,854

24,073

4,069

BANGKOK

91

71

12

HANOI

63

33

5

HANOI

17,854,724

9,352,475

1,417,042

VND/sqm

HO CHI MINH CITY

61

32

5

HO CHI MINH CITY

17,287,908

9,069,066

1,417,042

30

31

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

Project & Development Services (PDS)

DESIGN & BUILD PROJECT MANAGEMENT COST MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

TECHNICAL ADVISORY & DUE DILIGENCE REPORTING DEVELOPMENT & COMMERCIAL ADVISORY WORKPLACE STRATEGY DESIGN SUSTAINABILITY ADVISORY

Custodians of Capital Expenditure

Cushman & Wakefield is a trusted partner for occupiers and investors to manage their capital expenditure and project delivery in Asia Pacific. By seeing things differently, we anticipate market changes and are first to capitalise, ensuring clients and the business can be what’s next in their respective sectors. Leveraging our global networks and local experience, we prudently optimise capital expenditure and deliver integrated design, project and construction management services for our clients. We listen closely to our clients, fully understanding their projects’ goals and business needs while driving business results well beyond project delivery “on time and on budget”. Our interdisciplinary teams use data-driven, predictive analytics to provide strategic and forward-looking advice to guide our clients through the entire real estate decision-making process, unearthing innovative facility solutions critical for productivity and maximising return on investment.

MULTI-SERVICE CLIENTS GLOBAL OCCUPIER SERVICES

TECHNICAL ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT KEY ACCOUNTS PROGRAMME

WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY, INDONESIA

32

33

Cushman & Wakefield

APAC Office Fit Out Cost Guide 2026

About Cushman & Wakefield

Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE: CWK) is a leading global commercial real estate services firm for occupiers and investors with approximately 53,000 employees in over 350 offices and nearly 60 countries. In 2025, the firm reported revenue of $10.3 billion across its core service lines of Services, Leasing, Capital markets, and Valuation and other. Built around the belief that Better never settles, the firm receives numerous industry and business accolades for its award-winning culture. For additional information, visit www.cushmanwakefield.com.

Contact

RESEARCH

Dr Dominic Brown Head of International Research dominic.brown@cushwake.com

PROJECT & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

ASIA PACIFIC Tom Gibson

James Normandale Senior Director Asia Pacific james.normandale@cushwake.com

Andrew Carmichael Senior Director Asia Pacific andrew.carmichael@cushwake.com

President, PDS, Sustainability and Data Centre Group, APAC & EMEA tom.gibson@cushwake.com

SOUTHEAST ASIA Riaz Khan riaz.khan1@cushwake.com INDONESIA Dick Bernadi dick.bernadi@cushwake.com MALAYSIA Adrian Choong adrian.choong@cushwake.com

SINGAPORE Grant Carter grant.carter@cushwake.com VIETNAM Hung Hyunh hung.huynh@cushwake.com

AUSTRALIA Hutch Bykerk hutch.bykerk@cushwake.com NEW ZEALAND Todd Hanrahan todd.hanrahan@cushwake.com JAPAN Jun Matthews jun.matthews@cushwake.com

GREATER CHINA - NORTH CHINA Meng Zhao meng.zhao@cushwake.com GREATER CHINA - HONG KONG Ranee Ng ranee.ng@cushwake.com

GREATER CHINA - EAST CHINA Johnson Kong johnson.fb.kong@cushwake.com

GREATER CHINA - SOUTH CHINA Michael Wu michael.wu1@cushwake.com

PHILIPPINES Cedric Bada cedric.bada@cushwake.com THAILAND Riaz Khan riaz.khan1@cushwake.com

GREATER CHINA - TAIWAN Gile Wei gile.wei@cushwake.com

SOUTH KOREA Jaehong Lee jaehong.lee@cushwake.com INDIA Shashi Bushan shashi.bushan@cushwake.com

AMERICAS Andy Jansen andy.jansen@cushwake.com

EMEA Nic Wilkinson nic.wilkinson@cushwake.com

Page 1 Page 2-3 Page 4-5 Page 6-7 Page 8-9 Page 10-11 Page 12-13 Page 14-15 Page 16-17 Page 18-19 Page 20-21 Page 22-23 Page 24-25 Page 26-27 Page 28-29 Page 30-31 Page 32-33 Page 34

www.cushmanwakefield.com

Powered by